195 AC - 214 AC

A person named Sirinaga, who came forward against King Kuddhanaga, advanced with an army close to the city, deposed the king, and seized the throne. The Mahavamsa does not mention that he killed the king. According to records, King Sirinaga was both the commander-in-chief of King Kuddhanaga and also the brother of his queen. His name appears as “Kuda Sirinaga” (Little Sirinaga) in texts such as the Nikaya Sangrahaya, Rajarathnakara, Sulu Rajavaliya, and Saddharma Ratnakaraya, while the Pujavaliya refers to him as “Kuda Sirina” (Little Sirina), describing him as a “brother-in-law.”
The term “brother-in-law” here refers to “the brother-in-law of King Kuddhanaga.” The kinship described in the Mahavamsa—as the queen’s brother—and the kinship described in the Pujavaliya—as brother-in-law—create a certain ambiguity. The word “bēnā” (බෑනා) in Sinhala can also mean “brother,” depending on context. If it is interpreted that way, then Sirinaga could in some sense be considered the king’s brother.
In this matter, we must rely primarily on inscriptional evidence. Although the relationship between King Sirinaga and King Kuddhanaga has been clarified above, historical texts do not record exactly whose son Sirinaga was.
An inscription discovered at the ancient Isurumuniya Vihara—now mistakenly referred to as Vessagiri Vihara—mentions a King Tissa Maharaja, son of Sirinaka Maharaja, who himself was the son of King Tissa Maharaja. From this, it can be inferred that Sirinaka Maharaja refers to the first King Sirinaga discussed here, and that his son, Tissa Maharaja, is the same as Voharatissa Raja mentioned later in history.
As described above, the question arises: Who was the father of King Sirinaga? According to inscriptional evidence, he was none other than King Devanampiya Tissa II (Dutiya Bhāti Tissa), who, as mentioned in the Mahavamsa, was the brother of Kanittatissa, the first to ascend the throne.
If this interpretation holds, then King Cūlābhaya and King Sirinaga were brothers, both sons of Devanampiya Tissa II. By right, the throne should have gone to Prince Cūlābhaya, the son of the elder brother. However, Prince Kuddhanaga, the son of King Kanittatissa, killed him and took the throne. Disagreeing with this wrongful act, Prince Sirinaga, the brother of Commander Cūlanaga, rose up, killed King Kuddhanaga, and seized the throne.
Thus, in this struggle for power between the children of two brothers, two royal lives were lost in vain.
A story about a king named Sirinaga is also found in the Pali Rasavāhinī. According to that account, Sirinaga was of Brahmin lineage. Desiring to become king, he ordered his servants to break the Dakkinacetiya (Southern Stupa) to obtain treasure. But as they could not do so at twilight, he summoned a Chandala (outcaste) named Bahula of Sedolagama to break the stupa.
Bahula replied that “the Stupa of the Buddha, enshrining sacred relics, cannot be broken by anyone while still alive.” Enraged, Sirinaga impaled him on a stake. He then summoned his seven sons and ordered them too to break the stupa. When they refused, he impaled all seven and proceeded to break the Madhupitthika Stupa at Pachinapassaya, took the treasure, gathered an army, came to Anuradhapura, killed the reigning king, and became king himself. After some time, he contracted a severe stomach disease and died.
The Sirinaga mentioned in this story must be the same Sirinaga mentioned in the Mahavamsa. According to the chronicles, there were two kings named Sirinaga. The question arises: which one is referred to here? The chronicles make it clear that the second Sirinaga was the son of King Voharatissa. He does not appear to have engaged in any conflict to seize the throne. The one who did so was the first Sirinaga. Therefore, the Sirinaga mentioned in the Rasavāhinī must indeed be the first Sirinaga.
As we saw earlier in the Mahavamsa, he was the commander of King Kuddhanaga. Considering the breaking of the Southern Stupa near Anuradhapura and the impalement of the outcastes, it shows that these acts took place near the royal palace itself, indicating also the collapse of the administrative system.
The Mahavamsa gives further details about King Sirinaga’s works:
He gilded the umbrella of the Great Stupa (Mahathupa), constructed the five-storeyed Lohamahapaya, and built four flights of steps and a chattraprasada (umbrella pavilion) around the Great Bo-tree terrace (Maha Bodhi Maluwa).
If, as the Rasavāhinī claims, he had once destroyed stupas, then he must later have felt deep remorse and performed many acts of merit in repentance. However, these are not included in the chronicles (Vamsa kathā).
One special act of King Sirinaga mentioned in the Mahavamsa—that “through compassion he removed the kulambana of the island”—has led to various interpretations. The Pali text reads: Kulambanañ ca dīpasmiṁ vissajjesi dayāpāro.
In the translation by the venerable Sri Sumangala Thera and Batwatte Pandiduma, it is rendered: “He relieved the Kulaṁbu people of the island from royal service.” However, this is unclear. The word kulambana cannot simply mean “Kulumbu people.”
From the statement that “King Dāyāpāra removed it,” it appears that this kulambana was a burden or tax upon the people. Hence, it can be understood as referring to a tax known as Kulaamana in inscriptions.
It was a levy of eight droṇas of grain per kula. From the harvested grain, that portion was paid to the king as tax, called Kulaamana. Therefore, the word kulambana in the Pali Mahavamsa corresponds to this Kulaamana tax.
According to the Periyakadu Vihara inscription dated to his tenth regnal year, King Sirinaga’s rule appears to have been stable and peaceful, with no recorded internal unrest or turmoil. His authority seems to have been recognized throughout the island.
The Mahavamsa and Dipavamsa both record his reign as ten years, while the Rajavaliya and Rajarathnakara give twenty-one years. The Mahavamsa does not record any mention of the stomach disease (udarabādha) said to have afflicted him.